|

|
ARTICLES
OF
INTEREST
JULY - AUGUST, 2008 |
Orthodox North continues a series of various articles of relevance to modern Christians.
This month, we're including a thought-provoking article that
appeared in the February 07, 2008 edition of TIME magazine.
(NEW this month, let's also try something new.
Please email your comments to: feedback at orthodoxnorth.net.
I'll post a few each month at the bottom of the page. Please include
your name, city and state. I'll include only your first name and last
initial to preserve your privacy. Barb)
[Note: All previous articles may be
viewed from the "Articles
Archive" page.] |
"Christians Wrong about Heaven, Says Bishop"
An Article from TIME magazine
David Van Biema
|
 |
N.T. "Tom" Wright is one of the most
formidable figures in the world of Christian thought. As Bishop of
Durham, he is the fourth most senior cleric in the Church of England and
a major player in the strife-riven global Anglican Communion; as a
much-read theologian and Biblical scholar he has taught at Cambridge and
is a hero to conservative Christians worldwide for his 2003 book /The
Resurrection of the Son of God,/ which argued forcefully for a literal
interpretation of that event.
It therefore comes as a something of a shock that Wright doesn't believe
in heaven â?” at least, not in the way that millions of Christians
understand the term. In his new book, /Surprised by Hope/ (HarperOne),
Wright quotes a children's book by California first lady Maria Shriver
called /What's Heaven,/ which describes it as "a beautiful place where
you can sit on soft clouds and talk... If you're good throughout your
life, then you get to go [there]... When your life is finished here on
earth, God sends angels down to take you heaven to be with him." That,
says Wright is a good example of "what not to say." The Biblical truth,
he continues, "is very, very different."
Wright, 58, talked by phone with TIME's David Van Biema.
|
|
TIME: At one point you call the common view of heaven a "distortion and
serious diminution of Christian hope."
Wright: It really is. I've often heard people say, "I'm going to heaven
soon, and I won't need this stupid body there, thank goodness.' That's a
very damaging distortion, all the more so for being unintentional.
TIME: How so? It seems like a typical sentiment.
Wright: There are several important respects in which it's unsupported
by the New Testament. First, the timing. In the Bible we are told that
you die, and enter an intermediate state. St. Paul is very clear that
Jesus Christ has been raised from the dead already, but that nobody else
has yet. Secondly, our physical state. The New Testament says that when
Christ does return, the dead will experience a whole new life: not just
our soul, but our bodies. And finally, the location. At no point do the
resurrection narratives in the four Gospels say, "Jesus has been raised,
therefore we are all going to heaven." It says that Christ is coming
here, to join together the heavens and the Earth in an act of new
creation.
TIME: Is there anything more in the Bible about the period between death
and the resurrection of the dead?
Wright: We know that we will be with God and with Christ, resting and
being refreshed. Paul writes that it will be conscious, but compared
with being bodily alive, it will be like being asleep. The Wisdom of
Solomon, a Jewish text from about the same time as Jesus, says "the
souls of the righteous are in the hand of God," and that seems like a
poetic way to put the Christian understanding, as well.
TIME: But it's not where the real action is, so to speak?
Wright: No. Our culture is very interested in life after death, but the
New Testament is much more interested in what I've called the life
/after/ life after death in the ultimate resurrection into the new
heavens and the new Earth. Jesus' resurrection marks the beginning of a
restoration that he will complete upon his return. Part of this will be
the resurrection of all the dead, who will "awake," be embodied and
participate in the renewal. John Polkinghorne, a physicist and a priest,
has put it this way: "God will download our software onto his hardware
until the time he gives us new hardware to run the software again for
ourselves." That gets to two things nicely: that the period after death
is a period when we are in God's presence but not active in our own
bodies, and also that the more important transformation will be when we
are again embodied and administering Christ's kingdom.
|
TIME: That is rather different from the common understanding. Did some
Biblical verse contribute to our confusion?
Wright: There is Luke 23, where Jesus says to the good thief on the
cross, "Today you will be with me in Paradise." But in Luke, we know
first of all that Christ himself will not be resurrected for three days,
so "paradise" cannot be a resurrection. It has to be an intermediate
state. And chapters 4 and 5 of Revelation, where there is a vision of
worship in heaven that people imagine describes our worship at the end
of time. In fact it's describing the worship that's going on right now.
If you read the book through, you see that at the end we don't have a
description of heaven, but, as I said, of the new heavens and the new
earth joined together.
TIME: Why, then, have we misread those verses?
Wright: It has, originally, to do with the translation of Jewish ideas
into Greek. The New Testament is deeply, deeply Jewish, and the Jews had
for some time been intuiting a final, physical resurrection. They
believed that the world of space and time and matter is messed up, but
remains basically good, and God will eventually sort it out and put it
right again. Belief in that goodness is absolutely essential to
Christianity, both theologically and morally. But Greek-speaking
Christians influenced by Plato saw our cosmos as shabby and misshapen
and full of lies, and the idea was not to make it right, but to escape
it and leave behind our material bodies. The church at its best has
always come back toward the Hebrew view, but there have been times when
the Greek view was very influential.
TIME: Can you give some historical examples?
Wright: Two obvious ones are Dante's great poetry, which sets up a
Heaven, Purgatory and Hell immediately after death, and Michelangelo's
/Last Judgment/ in the Sistine chapel, which portrays heaven and hell as
equal and opposite last destinations. Both had enormous influence on
Western culture, so much so that many Christians think that is
Christianity.
TIME: But it's not.
Wright: Never at any point do the Gospels or Paul say Jesus has been
raised, therefore we are we are all going to heaven. They all say, Jesus
is raised, therefore the new creation has begun, and we have a job to
do.
TIME: That sounds a lot like... work.
Wright: It's more exciting than hanging around listening to nice music.
In Revelation and Paul's letters we are told that God's people will
actually be running the new world on God's behalf. The idea of our
participation in the new creation goes back to Genesis, when humans are
supposed to be running the Garden and looking after the animals. If you
transpose that all the way through, it's a picture like the one that you
get at the end of Revelation.
TIME: And it ties in to what you've written about this all having a
moral dimension.
Wright: Both that, and the idea of bodily resurrection that people deny
when they talk about their "souls going to Heaven." If people think "my
physical body doesn't matter very much," then who cares what I do with
it? And if people think that our world, our cosmos, doesn't matter much,
who cares what we do with that? Much of "traditional" Christianity gives
the impression that God has these rather arbitrary rules about how you
have to behave, and if you disobey them you go to hell, rather than to
heaven. What the New Testament really says is God wants you to be a
renewed human being helping him to renew his creation, and his
resurrection was the opening bell. And when he returns to fulfill the
plan, you won't be going up there to him, he'll be coming down here.
TIME: That's very different from, say, the vision put out in the /Left
Behind/ books.
Wright: Yes. If there's going to be an Armageddon, and we'll all be in
heaven already or raptured up just in time, it really doesn't matter if
you have acid rain or greenhouse gases prior to that. Or, for that
matter, whether you bombed civilians in Iraq. All that really matters is
saving souls for that disembodied heaven.
TIME: Has anyone you've talked to expressed disappointment at the loss
of the old view?
Wright: Yes, you might get disappointment in the case where somebody has
recently gone through the death of somebody they love and they are
wanting simply to be with them. And I'd say that's understandable. But
the end of Revelation describes a marvelous human participation in God's
plan. And in almost all cases, when I've explained this to people,
there's a sense of excitement and a sense of, "Why haven't we been told
this before?"Nicholas Thomas "Tom"
Wright (b.
1 December
1948)
is the
Bishop of
Durham in the
Church of
England and a leading
New Testament
scholar. His academic work has usually been published under the name N.
T. Wright.
|
|
To:
Previous Orthodox Articles
NOTICE: Individuals, Churches or
Orthodox organizations may submit articles for publication directly
to: info at orthodoxnorth.net
All articles will be reviewed and may be declined at the
discretion of Orthodox North.
|
|